Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Political Knowledge Scale× | Škála politické participace× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor | Politická psychologie | Politická psychologie |
| Rodina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 1993 | 1995 |
| Tvůrce≠ | Michael Delli Carpini & Scott Keeter | Sidney Verba, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Henry Brady |
| Typ≠ | Factual knowledge battery | Self-report |
| Původní zdroj≠ | Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1179-1206. DOI ↗ | Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. link ↗ |
| Další názvy | Civic Knowledge Battery, Factual Political Knowledge Index, Delli Carpini-Keeter Knowledge Items | PPCS, Civic Participation Measure, Political Activity Scale |
| Příbuzné≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Shrnutí≠ | The Political Knowledge Scale measures the range of factual information about politics that citizens hold and can retrieve, operationalized as a battery of factual quiz items. Delli Carpini and Keeter (1993, 1996) established the canonical short batteries (often five items) and argued that general political knowledge, not domain-specific information, is the most useful and reliable construct for survey research. | The Political Participation Scale measures engagement in civic and political activities, encompassing voting, campaign involvement, contacting officials, organizational membership, community volunteering, and protest activity. Developed by Verba, Schlozman, and Brady (1995), the measure captures both conventional participation (voting, contacting representatives) and unconventional participation (protest, civil disobedience). It addresses fundamental questions in political science: Why do some citizens engage while others withdraw? How do structural resources (time, money, education) and psychological factors (efficacy, interest) drive participation? |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|