ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Pilotní přirozený experiment×Pilotní terénní experiment×
OborPlánování experimentůPlánování experimentů
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku2000s–2010s (as formalized practice)Mid-20th century (systematised 1960s–1990s)
TvůrceCombination of natural experiment tradition (Dunning, Angrist, Pischke) and pilot study methodologyRooted in Campbell & Stanley (1966) experimental design tradition; formalised in clinical and social research through the 20th century
TypQuasi-experimental feasibility designExperimental design
Původní zdrojDunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107017412Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally. ISBN: 978-0395307878
Další názvyfeasibility natural experiment, preliminary natural experiment, pilot quasi-experiment, exploratory natural experimentpilot field trial, small-scale field experiment, feasibility field experiment, exploratory field experiment
Příbuzné43
ShrnutíA pilot natural experiment is a small-scale preliminary study that exploits an existing exogenous event or policy variation to test whether a full natural experiment is viable. It preserves the core logic of natural experiments — using real-world discontinuities to approximate causal inference — while explicitly scoping the work to assess data availability, group comparability, effect detectability, and procedural feasibility before committing resources to a larger study.A pilot field experiment is a small-scale, preliminary version of a planned full field experiment conducted in a naturalistic setting. It tests whether the intervention, randomisation procedure, measurement instruments, and logistical protocols are feasible before committing to a full-scale study. Results inform sample size calculations, refine treatment protocols, and identify procedural risks — saving resources and improving the quality of the definitive study.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Pilot Natural Experiment · Pilot Field Experiment. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare