ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Pravděpodobnostně váhavé rozšíření metody TOPSIS×Metoda vážení kritérií CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method)×
OborRozhodováníRozhodování
RodinaMCDMMCDM
Rok vzniku2016
TvůrcePENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCHZavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypProbabilistic Hesitant outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Původní zdrojPENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCH (). PENDING — PHF-TOPSIS specific seminal not confirmed. Zhang et al. 2017 (doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.001) is the foundational PHFS paper, not a PHF-TOPSIS paper. L.formulation.en cites 'Zhu & Xu 2018' as PHF-TOPSIS anchor — unverified. Candidate from search: Naeem et al. 2021 'Extended TOPSIS method based on the entropy measure and probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information' (JIFS, doi:10.3233/JIFS-202700) — not confirmed as the canonical seminal.. link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Další názvy
Příbuzné88
ShrnutíPHF-TOPSIS (Probabilistic Hesitant extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by PENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCH. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: PHF-TOPSIS · CILOS. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare