ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Participativní interpretativní fenomenologická analýza×Reflexivní tematická analýza×
OborKvalitativní metodyKvalitativní metody
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku2000s–2010s2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
TvůrceJonathan A. Smith (IPA foundation); adapted by participatory researchers in disability, health, and education studiesVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TypQualitative research designQualitative research method
Původní zdrojSmith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Další názvyParticipatory IPA, P-IPA, participatory phenomenological inquiry, collaborative IPARTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Příbuzné56
ShrnutíParticipatory Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Participatory IPA) merges the interpretive, meaning-focused rigour of IPA with participatory research principles, engaging participants as active co-researchers in the design, data collection, and analytic phases. The approach is especially valued in studies involving marginalised or vulnerable groups — such as people with cognitive impairments, chronic illness, or lived experience of social exclusion — where standard interview protocols may silence rather than amplify participant voice.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Participatory Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare