ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Hodnocení ordinální obsahové validity×Analýza položek (klasická testová teorie)×
OborPsychometrikaPsychometrika
RodinaLatent structureLatent structure
Rok vzniku20031979
TvůrceWynd, Schmidt & SchaeferClassical Test Theory tradition; foundational texts by Allen & Yen (1979) and Crocker & Algina (1986)
TypScale validation / content validityDescriptive / psychometric screening
Původní zdrojWynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole. ISBN: 978-0818501333
Další názvyordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validityMadde Analizi (Klasik Test Kuramı), CTT item analysis, classical item analysis
Příbuzné45
ShrnutíOrdinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain.Item analysis is the foundational psychometric procedure for evaluating the quality of individual test or scale items within the Classical Test Theory (CTT) framework, as systematised by Allen and Yen (1979) and Crocker and Algina (1986). It produces an item difficulty index, an item discrimination index, and a distractor analysis for each item, enabling test developers to identify items that are too easy, too hard, or failing to separate high- and low-ability respondents.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Ordinal Content Validity · Item Analysis. Získáno 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare