ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Síťová metaanalýza×Analýza publikační zkreslenosti×
OborSyntéza důkazůMetaanalýza
RodinaProcess / pipelineHypothesis test
Rok vzniku20021997
TvůrceLumley (2002)Matthias Egger et al.
TypMethodDiagnostic bias test for meta-analysis
Původní zdrojLumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. DOI ↗
Další názvyMixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-AnalysisSmall-Study Effects Test, Funnel Plot Asymmetry Test, Egger Regression Test, Yayın Yanlılığı Analizi
Příbuzné11
ShrnutíNetwork meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied.Publication bias analysis examines whether the set of studies included in a meta-analysis is a representative sample of all conducted research, or whether studies with non-significant or unfavorable results have been systematically suppressed. Matthias Egger and colleagues introduced the regression-based funnel plot asymmetry test in 1997, providing a formal statistical complement to the graphical funnel plot inspection long used in evidence synthesis.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Network Meta-Analysis · Publication Bias Analysis. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare