Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Multi-Level Perspective on Transitions× | Technological Innovation Systems× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| Rodina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 2002 | 2008 |
| Tvůrce≠ | Frank W. Geels (building on Arie Rip and René Kemp) | Anna Bergek, Staffan Jacobsson, Bo Carlsson and colleagues |
| Typ≠ | Conceptual framework and analytic method for sociotechnical change | Systems-of-innovation framework and scheme of analysis |
| Původní zdroj≠ | Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. DOI ↗ | Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429. DOI ↗ |
| Další názvy | MLP, Multi-level perspective framework, Sociotechnical transitions analysis | TIS analysis, Technological innovation system approach, Functional dynamics scheme |
| Příbuzné | 4 | 4 |
| Shrnutí≠ | The Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) is a middle-range framework for analysing how large sociotechnical systems—energy, mobility, food, water—shift from one dominant configuration to another. It locates change in the interplay of three analytic levels: protected niches where radical novelties incubate, the incumbent sociotechnical regime that structures ordinary practice, and a slow-moving exogenous landscape. Transitions occur when landscape pressures destabilise the regime and open windows of opportunity for maturing niche innovations to break through. | Technological Innovation Systems (TIS) analysis studies the emergence, growth, and performance of a specific technology by treating it as a system of actors, networks, and institutions that interact to generate, diffuse, and use that technology. Building on the systems-of-innovation tradition, the influential scheme of Bergek and colleagues combines a structural account of the system's components with a functional analysis of the key processes—or functions—that an innovation system must perform, then compares achieved with desired functionality to diagnose inducement and blocking mechanisms and derive policy. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|