ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Meta-analýza×Publikační zkreslení×
OborAkademické psaníStatistika ve výzkumu
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku19761979
TvůrceGlass (1976, term coining); Fisher and Pearson (statistical foundations)Robert Rosenthal
TypDocument TypeConcept
Původní zdrojPage, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. DOI ↗
Další názvyquantitative synthesis, meta-synthesis, pooled analysis, statistical integrationfile drawer problem, selective reporting, outcome reporting bias, funnel plot asymmetry
Příbuzné24
ShrnutíMeta-analysis is the statistical pooling of quantitative findings from multiple independent studies to produce a combined effect estimate. By aggregating data across studies, meta-analysis increases statistical power, reduces random error, and provides a precise summary of an intervention's effectiveness or an association's magnitude. Gene V. Glass coined the term in 1976, formalizing a technique that has become indispensable for evidence synthesis in medicine, psychology, education, and other evidence-based disciplines.Publication bias occurs when the results of a study influence whether the study is published. Typically, studies with statistically significant or positive results are more likely to be published than studies with non-significant or negative results, even if both are scientifically valid. This bias distorts the published literature, making treatments appear more effective than they actually are. Rosenthal (1979) termed this the 'file drawer problem': research with null results sits in file drawers, unpublished, creating a biased sample of published evidence. Funnel plots and statistical tests (e.g., Egger test) can detect asymmetry suggesting publication bias; meta-analyses must account for this bias.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Meta-Analysis · Publication Bias. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare