ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Hodnocení předpokladu nepřetržitého trvání podniku×Hodnocení vnitřních kontrol×
OborÚčetnictvíÚčetnictví
RodinaMCDMMCDM
Rok vzniku19881992
TvůrceAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)
TypAudit assessment and reporting frameworkComprehensive control evaluation framework
Původní zdrojAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Evaluating Compliance with Going Concern Assumption. AU-C Section 570. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. COSO Publications. link ↗
Další názvyGoing Concern Analysis, Entity Viability Assessment, Continuity EvaluationCOSO Framework, Control Design Testing, Internal Control Assessment
Příbuzné34
ShrnutíGoing Concern Evaluation is an auditor framework for assessing whether the entity being audited will be able to continue operating and meeting its obligations in the foreseeable future (typically, one year from the financial statement date). Required by auditing standards, this assessment examines financial and operational indicators of distress and evaluates management's plans to address concerns, ultimately determining whether financial statements require modification or special disclosure.Internal Control Evaluation is a systematic methodology for assessing the design and effectiveness of an entity's internal control system using the COSO Integrated Framework. Developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, this approach evaluates five interrelated components—control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring—to determine whether controls are adequate to prevent and detect errors and fraud.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Going Concern Evaluation · Internal Control Evaluation. Získáno 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare