Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Vícestupňová rozhodovací analýza založená na GIS (GIS-MCDA)× | Analytic Hierarchy Process× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor≠ | Prostorová analýza | Rozhodování |
| Rodina≠ | Process / pipeline | MCDM |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 2006 | 1980 |
| Tvůrce≠ | Jacek Malczewski (GIS-MCDA synthesis) | Saaty, T. L. |
| Typ≠ | Spatial multi-criteria suitability/decision analysis | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Původní zdroj≠ | Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726. DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Další názvy≠ | GIS-MCDM, spatial multi-criteria analysis, GIS-AHP, weighted overlay suitability | — |
| Příbuzné≠ | 4 | 8 |
| Shrnutí≠ | GIS-MCDA combines the map layers of a geographic information system with multi-criteria decision analysis to produce suitability or priority maps — ranking locations by how well they satisfy several weighted criteria at once. It is the standard framework for spatial decisions such as siting hospitals, solar farms, landfills, or evacuation areas, integrating methods like AHP, TOPSIS, and weighted overlay with spatial data. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|