Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Terénní autoetnografie× | Interpretivní autoetnografie× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor | Kvalitativní metody | Kvalitativní metody |
| Rodina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok vzniku | 1990s–2000s | 1990s–2000s |
| Tvůrce≠ | Ellis, Adams, and Bochner; building on autoethnography foundations by Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner | Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner (evocative strand); Leon Anderson (analytic/interpretive strand) |
| Typ≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative self-study design |
| Původní zdroj | Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10. link ↗ | Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10. link ↗ |
| Další názvy | field autoethnography, site-based autoethnography, embodied field autoethnography, FBAE | interpretive autoethnography, evocative autoethnography, analytic autoethnography, IAE |
| Příbuzné | 6 | 6 |
| Shrnutí≠ | Field-based autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher immerses themselves in a specific physical or social setting and draws on their own lived experience within that field to produce analytically reflexive accounts. It blends the systematic observational practices of ethnographic fieldwork with the first-person introspective voice of autoethnography, generating knowledge that is simultaneously personal, cultural, and contextually grounded. | Interpretive autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher uses systematic analysis of their own lived experience as the primary data source, moving beyond evocative personal narrative to connect personal meaning with broader cultural, social, or theoretical frameworks. Drawing on Leon Anderson's analytic strand and building on Ellis and Bochner's foundational work, it treats the researcher's self-account as both evidence and interpretive lens, subjecting personal stories to disciplined ethnographic and theoretical scrutiny to generate insights that extend beyond the individual case. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|