ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Neproporcionální shlukový výběr – shlukový výběr s nestejnou pravděpodobností×Vážené vzorkování×
OborMetodologie dotazníkových šetřeníMetodologie dotazníkových šetření
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vznikuMid-20th century (formalised 1950s–1965)1940s–1952 (formalized in large-scale government survey work and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator)
TvůrceLeslie Kish; William G. CochranMorris H. Hansen, William N. Hurwitz; D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson (theoretical framework)
TypProbability sampling designProbability sampling design
Původní zdrojKish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471489009Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407
Další názvydisproportionate cluster sampling, unequal-probability cluster sampling, variable-rate cluster sampling, non-proportional cluster samplingprobability proportional to size sampling, PPS sampling, unequal probability sampling, importance sampling
Příbuzné66
ShrnutíDisproportional cluster sampling is a probability-based survey design in which naturally occurring groups (clusters) are selected as primary sampling units, but the number of clusters or elements drawn from each group is not proportional to that group's share of the population. By deliberately over- or under-sampling certain clusters, researchers gain analytic flexibility and precision where it matters most, at the cost of requiring post-hoc weighting for population-level inference.Weighted sampling is a probability-based design in which units are selected with unequal probabilities proportional to a known auxiliary measure of size or importance. Sampling weights — the inverse of inclusion probabilities — are applied during analysis so that each sampled unit correctly represents the population units it stands for. The approach underpins large-scale government, health, and social surveys where simple random sampling would be inefficient.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Disproportional cluster sampling · Weighted Sampling. Získáno 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare