Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Digitální kvalitativní obsahová analýza× | Tematická analýza× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor≠ | Kvalitativní metody | Kvalitativní výzkum |
| Rodina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 2010s (building on qualitative content analysis traditions from 1983–2012) | 2006 |
| Tvůrce≠ | Adapted from Philipp Mayring and Margrit Schreier; digital extension by multiple scholars in the 2010s | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Typ≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Původní zdroj≠ | Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029485 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Další názvy≠ | DQCA, qualitative content analysis of digital data, online qualitative content analysis, digital QCA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Příbuzné≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Shrnutí≠ | Digital Qualitative Content Analysis (DQCA) is a systematic method for interpreting meaning from digital texts — social media posts, forum threads, blogs, emails, and other online content — through a structured, category-driven coding process. It extends the established tradition of qualitative content analysis (Mayring; Schreier) to the scale, multimodality, and contextual specificity of digital environments, prioritising interpretive depth over frequency counting. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|