Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Analýza digitálního obsahu× | Analýza diskurzu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor≠ | Kvalitativní metody | Kvalitativní výzkum |
| Rodina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 1950s (classical); digital adaptation 2000s–2010s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Tvůrce≠ | Building on Berelson (1952) and Krippendorff (1980); adapted for digital contexts by Herring (2010) and Neuendorf (2002+) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Typ≠ | Qualitative/quantitative hybrid research approach | Method |
| Původní zdroj≠ | Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The Content Analysis Guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412979474 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Další názvy≠ | DCA, online content analysis, web content analysis, digital media content analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Příbuzné≠ | 4 | 2 |
| Shrnutí≠ | Digital Content Analysis is a systematic research method for describing, categorising, and interpreting the content of digital materials — social media posts, websites, online forums, blogs, emails, and video transcripts. It applies the rigorous coding logic of classical content analysis to digitally native or digitally collected text, enabling researchers to move from raw online data to structured, interpretable findings about communication, meaning, and social phenomena. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|