ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Metoda Delfi×Metoda pořadí alternativ s normalizací ve dvou krocích×
OborRozhodováníRozhodování
RodinaMCDMMCDM
Rok vzniku19632022
TvůrceDalkey, N., Helmer, O.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TypWeight_Subjective (expert consensus, iterative Likert/ranking)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Původní zdrojDalkey, N., Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science DOI ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Další názvy
Příbuzné88
ShrnutíDELPHI (Delphi Method — iterative expert consensus for criterion importance elicitation) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. in 1963. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: DELPHI · AROMAN. Získáno 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare