ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Kritická tematická analýza×Reflexivní tematická analýza×
OborKvalitativní metodyKvalitativní metody
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku2000s–2010s (consolidation as named variant)2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
TvůrceDraws on Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis, 2006) combined with critical theory traditions (Frankfurt School, feminist and postcolonial theorists)Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TypQualitative analysis approachQualitative research method
Původní zdrojBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Další názvyCTA, critical-theoretic thematic analysis, thematic analysis with critical lens, critical qualitative thematic inquiryRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Příbuzné56
ShrnutíCritical thematic analysis (CTA) is a qualitative approach that combines the systematic coding procedures of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis with the interrogative stance of critical theory. Rather than merely describing patterns in data, CTA asks whose interests those patterns serve, what power relations they reflect, and what is absent or silenced. It is used to surface ideology, structural inequality, and hegemonic assumptions embedded in participants' accounts or in texts.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Critical Thematic Analysis · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Získáno 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare