ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Komplexní proporciální hodnocení×Objektivní vážení metodou CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation)×
OborRozhodováníRozhodování
RodinaMCDMMCDM
Rok vzniku19962010
TvůrceZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Původní zdrojZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Další názvy
Příbuzné88
ShrnutíCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: COPRAS · CCSD. Získáno 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare