ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Obsahová validita×Diskriminační validita×
OborPsychometrikaPsychometrika
RodinaLatent structureLatent structure
Rok vzniku19751959
TvůrceC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
TypValidity evidence / expert judgement procedureValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Původní zdrojLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Další názvycontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Příbuzné65
ShrnutíContent validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Content Validity · Discriminant Validity. Získáno 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare