ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Obsahová validita×Konvergentní validita×
OborPsychometrikaPsychometrika
RodinaLatent structureLatent structure
Rok vzniku19751959
TvůrceC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
TypValidity evidence / expert judgement procedureValidity evidence / construct validation
Původní zdrojLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Další názvycontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
Příbuzné64
ShrnutíContent validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Content Validity · Convergent Validity. Získáno 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare