Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Concurrent Intervention Mixed Methods× | Design smíšených metod s konvergentní triangulací× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor | Design výzkumu | Design výzkumu |
| Rodina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.) |
| Tvůrce≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark; Tashakkori & Teddlie | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Typ | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Původní zdroj≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 |
| Další názvy | concurrent mixed methods intervention design, simultaneous intervention mixed methods, CIMM design, parallel intervention mixed methods | convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation |
| Příbuzné≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Shrnutí≠ | Concurrent intervention mixed methods is a research design that embeds qualitative data collection within an experimental or quasi-experimental intervention study, with both data strands gathered simultaneously during the intervention period. Quantitative data assess intervention outcomes while qualitative data illuminate participants' experiences, implementation processes, or contextual factors — each strand informing the other at the integration stage. | The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|