ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Komparativní reflexivní tematická analýza×Reflexivní tematická analýza×
OborKvalitativní metodyKvalitativní metody
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku2006 (reflexive TA); comparative application formalised ~2019–20212006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
TvůrceVirginia Braun & Victoria ClarkeVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TypQualitative analytic approachQualitative research method
Původní zdrojBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953406Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Další názvyComparative RTA, cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, comparative qualitative thematic comparisonRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Příbuzné46
ShrnutíComparative Reflexive Thematic Analysis (CRTA) applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework to data drawn from two or more distinct groups, time points, or contexts, with the explicit goal of contrasting thematic patterns across those groups. The reflexive element means the analyst continuously interrogates how their own perspectives and positioning shape the themes they construct, while the comparative element directs attention to differences and similarities between data sets rather than seeking a single unified account.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Comparative Reflexive Thematic Analysis · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare