ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Komparativní autoetnografie×Reflexivní tematická analýza×
OborKvalitativní metodyKvalitativní metody
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~20132006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
TvůrceHayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & HernandezVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TypQualitative research designQualitative research method
Původní zdrojChang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Další názvycollaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAERTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Příbuzné66
ShrnutíComparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Comparative autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare