ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Uzavřený dodavatelský řetězec×Plánování uspořádání pracovišť (SLP)×
OborProvozní managementProvozní management
RodinaMachine learningMachine learning
Rok vzniku20031973
TvůrceGuide, V. D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N.Muther, R.
TypSupply chain strategyLayout design methodology
Původní zdrojGuide, V. D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2003). Business aspects of closed-loop supply chains. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University Press. link ↗Muther, R. (1973). Systematic layout planning (2nd ed.). Boston: Cahners Books. link ↗
Další názvyreverse logistics, circular economy logisticsSLP, plant layout
Příbuzné55
ShrnutíA closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) integrates forward logistics (moving products to customers) with reverse logistics (recovering products, components, or materials from customers) to optimize resource recovery, reduce waste, and minimize environmental impact. Products flow forward for customer use, then flow backward for remanufacturing, refurbishment, recycling, or proper disposal. CLSC is driven by regulatory compliance (e.g., take-back laws), cost recovery, environmental responsibility, and increasingly, customer demand for sustainable business practices.Systematic Layout Planning (SLP) is a structured methodology developed by Richard Muther in the 1960s–1970s for designing optimal plant and facility layouts. The approach systematizes the consideration of material flow, personnel movement, equipment relationships, and space constraints to minimize material handling costs, improve safety, and enhance flexibility. SLP has become the foundational framework for facility design in manufacturing, warehousing, and service environments.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Closed-Loop Supply Chain · Facility Layout (SLP). Získáno 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare