ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Analýza porovnání metod Bland-Altman×Cohenův koeficient Kappa×
OborStatistikaStatistika
RodinaHypothesis testHypothesis test
Rok vzniku19861960
TvůrceJ. Martin Bland & Douglas G. AltmanJacob Cohen
TypGraphical and statistical method comparisonInter-rater reliability coefficient
Původní zdrojBland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. DOI ↗Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. DOI ↗
Další názvyBland-Altman plot, limits of agreement analysis, method agreement analysis, Bland-Altman Uyum Analizikappa coefficient, kappa statistic, Cohen's Kappa (Değerlendiriciler Arası Uyum)
Příbuzné53
ShrnutíThe Bland-Altman analysis is a graphical and statistical technique for assessing agreement between two measurement methods applied to the same subjects. Introduced by J. Martin Bland and Douglas G. Altman in their landmark 1986 Lancet paper, it plots the difference between the two methods against their mean for each subject, and derives the bias (mean difference) along with limits of agreement (LoA) that capture 95% of differences in the population.Cohen's kappa (κ) is a statistical measure of inter-rater reliability for categorical classifications, introduced by Jacob Cohen in 1960. Unlike simple percent agreement, kappa corrects for the level of agreement that would be expected purely by chance, making it the standard metric when two raters independently assign observations to the same set of mutually exclusive categories.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Bland-Altman Analysis · Cohen's Kappa. Získáno 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare