পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন

	এসপিজে কাঠামো: ঝুঁকি মূল্যায়নের জন্য কাঠামোগত পেশাদারী বিচার	SAPROF: সহিংসতা ঝুঁকির জন্য সুরক্ষামূলক কারণগুলির কাঠামোগত মূল্যায়ন
ক্ষেত্র	ফরেনসিক মনোবিজ্ঞান	ফরেনসিক মনোবিজ্ঞান
পরিবার	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
উদ্ভবের বছর	2003	2012
প্রবর্তক	Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws	Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé
ধরন	Clinician-Synthesized	Clinician-rated
মৌলিক উৎস	Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.	de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief.
অপর নাম	SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework	SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF
সম্পর্কিত	4	4
সারসংক্ষেপ	The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.	The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.