পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| Social Construction of Technology× | Social Shaping of Technology× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1984 | 1985 |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Trevor Pinch & Wiebe Bijker | Donald MacKenzie, Judy Wajcman, Robin Williams, David Edge |
| ধরন≠ | Constructivist theory of technological development | Analytic tradition and method in the sociology of technology |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗ | MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.). Open University Press. ISBN: 9780335199136 |
| অপর নাম | SCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysis | SST analysis, Social shaping approach, Shaping of technology framework |
| সম্পর্কিত | 4 | 4 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one. | The Social Shaping of Technology (SST) is the umbrella tradition in the sociology of technology that rejects technological determinism and argues that the content and trajectory of technical artefacts are themselves outcomes of social, economic, organisational, and political choices. Rather than treating technology as an autonomous force whose effects society must merely absorb, SST analysis opens the 'black box' of design and shows that at every stage—conception, development, standardisation, and use—things could have been, and were, decided otherwise. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|