পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| সংক্ষিপ্ত রূপের নুমোলজিক্যাল বৈধতা× | গঠনগত বৈধতা× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | মনোমিতি | মনোমিতি |
| পরিবার | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1955 |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| ধরন≠ | Validity assessment technique | Validity evaluation framework |
| মৌলিক উৎস | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| অপর নাম | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 4 | 6 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|