পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| Script Analysis× | Social Construction of Technology× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1992 | 1984 |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Madeleine Akrich (with Bruno Latour) | Trevor Pinch & Wiebe Bijker |
| ধরন≠ | Material-semiotic analytic method for technological artefacts | Constructivist theory of technological development |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 205-224). MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262023382 | Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗ |
| অপর নাম | De-scription analysis, Technological script analysis, Inscription analysis | SCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysis |
| সম্পর্কিত | 4 | 4 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Script analysis, developed by Madeleine Akrich with Bruno Latour, treats technological artefacts like texts. When designers build a device, they inscribe a 'script' into it—a set of assumptions about who the users will be, what skills and motives they have, and how the world around the device is arranged—and the artefact then prescribes roles and conduct for the people and things it encounters. 'De-scription' is the analyst's method of reading that script back out of the object and comparing the user the designer projected with the user who actually appears, revealing the often invisible politics built into ordinary things. | The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|