পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| স্বাস্থ্য হস্তক্ষেপের পরিধি বৃদ্ধি (Scaling Up Health Interventions)× | বাস্তবায়ন ফলাফল শ্রেণীবিন্যাস× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | বাস্তবায়ন বিজ্ঞান | বাস্তবায়ন বিজ্ঞান |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 2007 | 2011 |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Simmons, R., Fajans, P., Ghiron, L. (World Health Organization) | Proctor, E. K., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., et al. |
| ধরন≠ | Framework | Taxonomy |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Simmons, R., Fajans, P., & Ghiron, L. (Eds.). (2007). Scaling Up Health Service Delivery: From Pilot Innovations to Policies and Programmes. World Health Organization, Geneva. link ↗ | Proctor, E. K., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G. A., Bunger, A., ... & Rojas, D. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65-76. DOI ↗ |
| অপর নাম≠ | scaling up, expansion, scale, dissemination | implementation outcomes, Proctor framework, implementation success measures |
| সম্পর্কিত | 5 | 5 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Scaling Up is the deliberate expansion of successful health interventions from pilot sites to entire health systems, regions, or countries. Formalized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Simmons et al. (2007), scaling up is distinct from simple dissemination; it requires systematic planning, financial modeling, capacity building, and policy alignment to ensure interventions work at scale. A pilot that succeeds brilliantly with champion leadership, dedicated funding, and motivated staff may fail when scaled to routine settings with limited resources. Scaling Up frameworks help practitioners anticipate and overcome these challenges. | The Implementation Outcome Taxonomy is a framework defining eight measurable dimensions for assessing implementation success: Acceptability, Adoption, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Fidelity, Implementation Cost, Penetration, and Sustainability. Developed by Proctor et al. (2011), it provides a standardized vocabulary and measurement approach to distinguish implementation process outcomes (how well was the intervention delivered?) from clinical outcomes (did patients get better?). This taxonomy is foundational to implementation science because it acknowledges that an evidence-based intervention can be effective (clinical outcome) but poorly implemented (implementation outcome), or feasible to deliver but not adopted by organizations. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|