পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন

	SAPROF: সহিংসতা ঝুঁকির জন্য সুরক্ষামূলক কারণগুলির কাঠামোগত মূল্যায়ন	এসপিজে কাঠামো: ঝুঁকি মূল্যায়নের জন্য কাঠামোগত পেশাদারী বিচার
ক্ষেত্র	ফরেনসিক মনোবিজ্ঞান	ফরেনসিক মনোবিজ্ঞান
পরিবার	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
উদ্ভবের বছর	2012	2003
প্রবর্তক	Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé	Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws
ধরন	Clinician-rated	Clinician-Synthesized
মৌলিক উৎস	de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief.	Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.
অপর নাম	SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF	SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework
সম্পর্কিত	4	4
সারসংক্ষেপ	The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.	The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.