পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| Robust Nomological Validity× | কনফার্মেটরি ফ্যাক্টর অ্যানালাইসিস (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | মনোমিতি | মনোমিতি |
| পরিবার | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1955 | 1969 |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| ধরন≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| অপর নাম | nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 5 | 4 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|