পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন

	রেগুলারাইজড ফেডারেটেড লার্নিং	নিয়ন্ত্রিত গ্রেডিয়েন্ট বুস্টিং
ক্ষেত্র	যন্ত্র শিখন	যন্ত্র শিখন
পরিবার	Machine learning	Machine learning
উদ্ভবের বছর	2020	2001 (gradient boosting); 2016 (explicit L1/L2 regularization in XGBoost)
প্রবর্তক	Li, T. et al. (FedProx); McMahan, B. et al. (FedAvg base)	Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (building on Friedman, J. H.)
ধরন	Distributed optimization with regularization	Regularized ensemble (additive tree model)
মৌলিক উৎস	Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Zaheer, M., Sanjabi, M., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems (MLSys), 2, 429–450.	Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794.
অপর নাম	FedProx, federated learning with regularization, proximal federated learning, penalized federated optimization	penalized gradient boosting, shrinkage-regularized boosting, XGBoost-style regularization, L1/L2 gradient boosting
সম্পর্কিত	6	6
সারসংক্ষেপ	Regularized federated learning extends the federated learning framework by adding penalty terms to each client's local objective, anchoring local updates closer to the global model. The canonical formulation — FedProx — adds a proximal term that controls how far any single client can drift, improving convergence and stability when client data distributions differ substantially.	Regularized gradient boosting extends the classic additive tree ensemble (Friedman 2001) by embedding L1 and L2 penalty terms directly into the training objective, along with a complexity penalty on tree size. Popularized by XGBoost (Chen & Guestrin 2016), this framework reduces overfitting and improves generalization compared to unpenalized boosting, while retaining the method's characteristic accuracy on tabular data.