পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| অংশগ্রহণমূলক সমালোচনামূলক আলোচনা বিশ্লেষণ× | ডিসকোর্স অ্যানালাইসিস× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র≠ | গুণগত | গুণগত গবেষণা |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1990s–2000s (emerged as integrated approach) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Draws on Ruth Wodak, Norman Fairclough (CDA) and Kurt Lewin, Orlando Fals Borda (participatory action research) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| ধরন≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Method |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761961543 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| অপর নাম≠ | PCDA, participatory CDA, collaborative critical discourse analysis, action-oriented CDA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 6 | 2 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Participatory Critical Discourse Analysis (PCDA) integrates the ideology-exposing tools of Critical Discourse Analysis with the community-centred ethics of participatory action research. Researchers and community members jointly collect and analyse texts and talk to reveal how language constructs, legitimises, or contests unequal power relations — and then use those insights to drive concrete social change. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|