পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| মেটা-রিগ্রেশন-ভিত্তিক মেটা-বিশ্লেষণ× | নেটওয়ার্ক মেটা-বিশ্লেষণ× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র≠ | বিজ্ঞানমিতি | প্রমাণ সংশ্লেষণ |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1993–1999 | 2002 |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Stephen G. Thompson & Simon J. Sharp (systematic framework); earlier work by Berlin, Longnecker & Greenland (1993) | Lumley (2002) |
| ধরন≠ | Quantitative evidence synthesis with covariate modeling | Method |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Thompson, S. G., & Sharp, S. J. (1999). Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 18(20), 2693–2708. DOI ↗ | Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗ |
| অপর নাম≠ | meta-regression, meta-analytic regression, weighted regression meta-analysis, MR-MA | Mixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 4 | 1 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Meta-regression-based meta-analysis extends standard meta-analysis by fitting a weighted regression model in which study-level characteristics (moderators) predict observed effect sizes. Rather than simply pooling effects, this approach asks why effects vary across studies — linking heterogeneity in outcomes to differences in population, intervention, design, or measurement features. It is the primary tool for explaining between-study variance in quantitative evidence synthesis. | Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|