পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| Longitudinal Historical Archival Research× | মৌখিক ইতিহাস পদ্ধতি× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | ক্ষেত্র পদ্ধতি | ক্ষেত্র পদ্ধতি |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 20th century (formalized in social science methodology by the 1970s–1990s) | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Established practice in historical and social science research traditions | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| ধরন≠ | Qualitative/mixed archival research design | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745602578 | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| অপর নাম | longitudinal archival study, diachronic archival research, historical longitudinal analysis, archival panel research | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 5 | 6 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Longitudinal historical archival research is a qualitative and documentary method that systematically examines primary archival sources — records, manuscripts, correspondence, institutional files — across multiple points in time to trace change, continuity, or development within a phenomenon over an extended historical period. By imposing a longitudinal dimension on standard archival inquiry, researchers can reconstruct how events, structures, policies, or social conditions evolved rather than capturing only a single historical moment. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|