পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| ব্যাখ্যামূলক সমালোচনামূলক ডিসকোর্স বিশ্লেষণ× | ডিসকোর্স অ্যানালাইসিস× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র≠ | গুণগত | গুণগত গবেষণা |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk (interpretive framing developed through constructivist qualitative traditions) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| ধরন≠ | Qualitative discourse analysis design | Method |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612126 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| অপর নাম≠ | interpretive CDA, constructivist critical discourse analysis, meaning-centred CDA, CDA-interpretivist | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 6 | 2 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Interpretive critical discourse analysis (interpretive CDA) combines the power-and-ideology lens of critical discourse analysis with an interpretivist epistemology that foregrounds meaning-making, context, and the researcher's own positionality. It examines how language constructs social reality, legitimises or challenges power relations, and circulates ideological assumptions — while acknowledging that both the texts under study and the analyst's reading of them are socially situated and context-dependent. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|