পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| ক্ষেত্র-ভিত্তিক সমালোচনামূলক আলোচনা বিশ্লেষণ× | ডিসকোর্স অ্যানালাইসিস× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র≠ | গুণগত | গুণগত গবেষণা |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1999–2001 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Norman Fairclough and Lilie Chouliaraki (synthesis with Bourdieu's field theory) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| ধরন≠ | Qualitative critical discourse framework | Method |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510357 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| অপর নাম≠ | Field-theoretic CDA, Bourdieusian CDA, sociological CDA, field-oriented discourse analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 5 | 2 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Field-based Critical Discourse Analysis (Field-based CDA) integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — structured social spaces with their own rules, capital, and positions — with the linguistic and critical tools of Critical Discourse Analysis. The approach examines how language constructs, legitimates, and contests power relations within specific institutional or social fields, situating texts in their broader sociological context rather than treating discourse in isolation. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|