পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| মূল্যায়ন-কেন্দ্রিক গুণগত-অগ্রাধিকার মিশ্র পদ্ধতি নকশা× | প্রোগ্রাম মূল্যায়ন× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র≠ | গবেষণা নকশা | ক্ষেত্র পদ্ধতি |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1989–2007 (formalized in evaluation and mixed methods literature) | 1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971) |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Jennifer C. Greene; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark | Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi |
| ধরন≠ | Mixed methods research design | Applied evaluation methodology |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944 |
| অপর নাম | qualitative-dominant evaluation mixed methods, QUAL-priority evaluation design, qualitative-led program evaluation, mixed methods evaluation with qualitative strand | evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 1 | 3 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | An evaluation-oriented qualitative-priority mixed methods design places qualitative data collection and analysis at the center of a program or policy evaluation, while selectively incorporating quantitative data to corroborate, contextualize, or extend qualitative findings. The design is guided by an evaluative purpose — assessing merit, worth, or significance of a program — with the qualitative strand carrying the primary interpretive weight and quantitative evidence serving a supplementary role. | Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|