পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| Document-based Program Evaluation× | মামলার আইন বিশ্লেষণ× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | ক্ষেত্র পদ্ধতি | ক্ষেত্র পদ্ধতি |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1960s–1970s (program evaluation field); document review as formal strategy codified in 1980s–1990s | Medieval English common law; academic formalisation 19th–20th century |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi and Howard Freeman (systematic program evaluation tradition) | Common law tradition (England); systematised in Anglo-American jurisprudence |
| ধরন≠ | Evaluation research design | Qualitative legal research method |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787908331 | Hutchinson, T. (2010). Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters. ISBN: 9780455227689 |
| অপর নাম | documentary program evaluation, records-based evaluation, document review evaluation, archival program evaluation | judicial decision analysis, legal case analysis, jurisprudential analysis, case-based legal research |
| সম্পর্কিত | 6 | 6 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Document-based program evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing a program's design, implementation, and outcomes using existing documentary evidence — such as policy statements, implementation reports, budgets, meeting minutes, and program artifacts — rather than primary data collection through interviews or observation. It is particularly suited to retrospective evaluations, accountability reviews, and contexts where direct fieldwork is impractical or infeasible. | Case law analysis is a systematic method for examining judicial decisions to identify binding legal rules, evolving doctrines, and interpretive trends. Rooted in the common law tradition of stare decisis, it requires the researcher to locate the ratio decidendi — the binding reasoning — of each decision, distinguish it from obiter dicta, and trace how that reasoning has been applied, distinguished, or overruled across subsequent cases. The method is fundamental to legal scholarship, litigation strategy, and law reform research. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|