ScholarGate
সহকারী

পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন

নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।

দলিল বিশ্লেষণ×গুণগত গবেষণার বিশ্বাসযোগ্যতার মানদণ্ড×
ক্ষেত্রগুণগত গবেষণাগুণগত গবেষণা
পরিবারProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
উদ্ভবের বছর19201985
প্রবর্তকMax Weber and Karl MannheimYvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
ধরনMethodFramework
মৌলিক উৎসScott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
অপর নামdocumentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival researchtrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability
সম্পর্কিত44
সারসংক্ষেপDocument analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.
ScholarGateডেটাসেট
  1. v1
  2. 4 উৎস
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 উৎস
  3. PUBLISHED

অনুসন্ধানে যান স্লাইড ডাউনলোড করুন

ScholarGateপদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন: Document Analysis · Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research. 2026-06-18 তারিখে সংগৃহীত, উৎস: https://scholargate.app/bn/compare