পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| সমালোচনামূলক কেস স্টাডি× | তুলনামূলক কেস স্টাডি× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | গুণগত | গুণগত |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1980s–2006 (formalized) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Bent Flyvbjerg (formalized); Robert K. Yin (case study typology) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| ধরন≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. DOI ↗ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| অপর নাম | critical case, strategic case study, critical-instance case study, paradigmatic case study | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 6 | 4 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | A critical case study is a case study design in which the researcher deliberately selects a case that is strategically important for testing, confirming, challenging, or extending an existing proposition, theory, or policy claim. Rather than choosing a typical or representative case, the researcher argues that if the finding holds here — in this most-likely, least-likely, or paradigmatic instance — it can reasonably be expected to hold more broadly. This purposive logic transforms a single case into a powerful analytical tool. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|