পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| অভিসারী বৈধতা× | নমোলজিক্যাল ভ্যালিডিটি× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | মনোমিতি | মনোমিতি |
| পরিবার | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 1959 | 1955 |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| ধরন≠ | Validity evidence / construct validation | Validity evidence framework |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| অপর নাম | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity |
| সম্পর্কিত≠ | 4 | 6 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|