পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| গঠনগত বৈধতা× | নমোলজিক্যাল ভ্যালিডিটি× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | মনোমিতি | মনোমিতি |
| পরিবার | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| উদ্ভবের বছর | 1955 | 1955 |
| প্রবর্তক | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| ধরন≠ | Validity evaluation framework | Validity evidence framework |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| অপর নাম≠ | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity |
| সম্পর্কিত | 6 | 6 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|