পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন
নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।
| ষড়যন্ত্র মানসিকতা প্রশ্নাবলী (Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire)× | রাজনৈতিক আস্থা পরিমাপক (Political Trust Scale)× | |
|---|---|---|
| ক্ষেত্র | রাজনৈতিক মনোবিজ্ঞান | রাজনৈতিক মনোবিজ্ঞান |
| পরিবার | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| উদ্ভবের বছর≠ | 2013 | 1974 |
| প্রবর্তক≠ | Roland Imhoff & Marko Bruder | Arthur H. Miller |
| ধরন | Self-report | Self-report |
| মৌলিক উৎস≠ | Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225. DOI ↗ | Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951-972. DOI ↗ |
| অপর নাম≠ | CMQ, Conspiracy Ideation Scale, Generic Conspiracy Belief | PTS, Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Trust Module |
| সম্পর্কিত | 3 | 3 |
| সারসংক্ষেপ≠ | The Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire measures individual differences in generic conspiracy thinking—the tendency to attribute significant events to hidden, coordinated group actions by powerful actors rather than to incompetence, chance, or transparent public causes. Developed by Bruder et al. (2013), the five-item CMQ assesses a stable dispositional trait that predicts belief in diverse conspiracy theories (JFK assassination, 9/11 truthers, anti-vaccine narratives, QAnon) and distrust of institutions. It captures conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude distinct from specific beliefs. | The Political Trust Scale measures citizen confidence in government institutions, elected officials, and the political system's responsiveness and fairness. Pioneered by Miller (1974) and operationalized across comparative electoral studies (CSES Module 5), the scale captures both diffuse trust (in the political system generally) and specific trust (in particular institutions such as parliament or the executive). It is central to understanding democratic legitimacy, political engagement, and support for democratic institutions. |
| ScholarGateডেটাসেট ↗ |
|
|