পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন

	কম্পিউটারাইজড অ্যাডাপ্টিভ টেস্টিং (CAT)-এ বিষয়বস্তু বৈধতা	কম্পিউটারাইজড অ্যাডাপ্টিভ টেস্টিং (CAT)-এ কনস্ট্রাক্ট ভ্যালিডিটি
ক্ষেত্র	মনোমিতি	মনোমিতি
পরিবার	Latent structure	Latent structure
উদ্ভবের বছর	1975 / 1980	1989–2000s
প্রবর্তক	Lawshe (content validity); Lord & Weiss (CAT framework)	Samuel Messick (unified validity framework); CAT application formalized by Wainer, van der Linden, and colleagues
ধরন	Validity evaluation / test design	Validity evaluation / psychometric evidence gathering
মৌলিক উৎস	Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.	Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan.
অপর নাম	CAT content validity, adaptive item bank content coverage, content balancing in CAT, CAT blueprint validity	CAT construct validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, construct validity evidence in CAT
সম্পর্কিত	6	6
সারসংক্ষেপ	Content validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) ensures that an adaptively administered assessment adequately samples the intended content domain despite delivering only a subset of items to each examinee. It integrates classical content validity methods with CAT-specific item bank design and content balancing algorithms to guarantee representative domain coverage at both the item bank and the individual test level.	Construct validity in computerized adaptive testing evaluates whether the latent trait estimates produced by a CAT instrument genuinely measure the intended psychological or educational construct. Because adaptive algorithms select items individually for each examinee, the validity evidence gathered must account for the variable item exposure and the IRT-based scoring that are unique to CAT administrations.