ScholarGate
সহকারী

পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন

নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।

Citizens' Jury Method×নমিনাল গ্রুপ টেকনিক×
ক্ষেত্রPublic Policyগুণগত
পরিবারProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
উদ্ভবের বছর19861971
প্রবর্তকNed Crosby (Jefferson Center); Peter Dienel developed the parallel PlanungszelleAndré L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de Ven
ধরনDeliberative mini-public methodQualitative research method
মৌলিক উৎসCrosby, N., Kelly, J. M., & Schaefer, P. (1986). Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 46(2), 170–178. DOI ↗Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗
অপর নামCitizens Jury, Citizen Panel, Citizens' PanelNGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group method
সম্পর্কিত46
সারসংক্ষেপA citizens' jury is a deliberative method that convenes a small, demographically representative panel of randomly selected citizens to consider a policy question in depth and produce reasoned recommendations. Modelled loosely on the trial jury, it gives ordinary people time, balanced information, expert witnesses and skilled facilitation so they can deliberate and reach a considered judgement on behalf of the wider public. Developed in the United States by Ned Crosby and his Jefferson Center, with a parallel German tradition (the Planungszelle) created by Peter Dienel, it is a leading form of deliberative 'mini-public'.The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.
ScholarGateডেটাসেট
  1. v1
  2. 1 উৎস
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 উৎস
  3. PUBLISHED

অনুসন্ধানে যান স্লাইড ডাউনলোড করুন

ScholarGateপদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন: Citizens' Jury Method · Nominal Group Technique. 2026-06-25 তারিখে সংগৃহীত, উৎস: https://scholargate.app/bn/compare