ScholarGate
সহকারী

পদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন

নির্বাচিত পদ্ধতিগুলো পাশাপাশি পর্যালোচনা করুন; যে সারিগুলোয় পার্থক্য আছে সেগুলো চিহ্নিত করা হয়।

Anticipatory Governance Analysis×Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment×
ক্ষেত্রScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
পরিবারProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
উদ্ভবের বছর20082013
প্রবর্তকDavid H. Guston, Daniel Barben, Erik Fisher, Cynthia SelinJack Stilgoe, Richard Owen, Phil Macnaghten
ধরনGovernance framework and analytic approach for emerging technologiesNormative governance and reflexive-assessment process
মৌলিক উৎসGuston, D. H. (2014). Understanding 'anticipatory governance'. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218-242. DOI ↗Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. DOI ↗
অপর নামAnticipatory governance framework, Foresight-engagement-integration analysis, Reflexive technology governanceRRI assessment, Responsible innovation framework, AIRR assessment
সম্পর্কিত44
সারসংক্ষেপAnticipatory governance is a framework for steering emerging technologies—nanotechnology, synthetic biology, AI—while their trajectories are still open, rather than waiting to react to harms after they have hardened. Developed by David Guston and colleagues at the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University, it defines anticipatory governance as a broad societal capacity, distributed across the research enterprise and the public, built from three intertwined components: foresight, public engagement, and integration. The aim is not to predict the future but to build the reflexive capacity to imagine plausible futures and act on them wisely in the present.Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) assessment is an approach to governing science and innovation that asks not only whether a technology works but whether it is desirable, and seeks to align research and innovation with the values, needs, and expectations of society. The influential Stilgoe-Owen-Macnaghten framework operationalises this through four dimensions—anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness (AIRR)—that are built into the innovation process so that direction and purpose, not just risk and product, become objects of deliberate care.
ScholarGateডেটাসেট
  1. v1
  2. 2 উৎস
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 উৎস
  3. PUBLISHED

অনুসন্ধানে যান স্লাইড ডাউনলোড করুন

ScholarGateপদ্ধতির তুলনা করুন: Anticipatory Governance Analysis · Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment. 2026-06-25 তারিখে সংগৃহীত, উৎস: https://scholargate.app/bn/compare