Glock-Stark Religiosity Dimensions
The Glock-Stark framework, set out in Charles Glock and Rodney Stark's 1965 Religion and Society in Tension, recast religiosity from a single global trait into five analytically distinct dimensions of religious commitment: belief (ideological), practice (ritualistic), experience (experiential), knowledge (intellectual), and consequences (the effects of religion on everyday conduct). The core claim is that an individual can rank high on one dimension and low on another, so a one-number measure of 'how religious' someone is conceals more than it reveals. Operationally, each dimension is tapped by its own cluster of survey items, scaled separately, and the correlations among the dimensions are themselves an object of study. This multidimensional measurement model became the template for nearly all later psychometric work on religiousness.
Прочетете целия метод
Влезте с безплатен профил, за да прочетете този раздел.
Карта на методите
Обкръжението на сродните методи — изберете възел, за да го разгледате.
Източници
- Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally. link ↗
- Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710-724. DOI: 10.3390/rel3030710 ↗
Как да цитирате тази страница
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Glock-Stark Multidimensional Religiosity (Five Dimensions of Religious Commitment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/bg/religious-studies/glock-stark-religiosity
Кой метод?
Поставете този метод до най-близките му сродни методи и ги четете едно до друго — библиотеката полага книгите на масата; изборът е ваш.
- Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)Religious Studies↔ сравняване
- Faith Maturity ScaleReligious Studies↔ сравняване
- Religious Orientation Scale (ROS)Religious Studies↔ сравняване
Цитиран в
Подобни методи
Забелязахте ли проблем на тази страница? Съобщете или предложете поправка →