Cranfield Evaluation Paradigm
The Cranfield evaluation paradigm is the foundational experimental design for measuring how well an information retrieval system finds relevant documents. Devised by Cyril Cleverdon at the College of Aeronautics in Cranfield during the 1960s, it fixes three ingredients — a document collection, a set of search requests, and human relevance judgments linking requests to documents — and then holds them constant so that competing indexing methods or retrieval algorithms can be compared on recall and precision under controlled, repeatable conditions. By abstracting evaluation away from any single live user and turning it into a reusable laboratory experiment, Cranfield made retrieval effectiveness a measurable quantity and supplied the template that every later large-scale campaign, including TREC, has built upon.
Прочетете целия метод
Влезте с безплатен профил, за да прочетете този раздел.
Карта на методите
Обкръжението на сродните методи — изберете възел, за да го разгледате.
Източници
- Cleverdon, C. W. (1967). The Cranfield tests on index language devices. Aslib Proceedings, 19(6), 173-194. DOI: 10.1108/eb050097 ↗
- Voorhees, E. M., & Harman, D. K. (Eds.). (2005). TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262220736
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
Как да цитирате тази страница
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Cranfield Evaluation Paradigm (Test-Collection Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/bg/library-information-science/cranfield-evaluation-paradigm
Кой метод?
Поставете този метод до най-близките му сродни методи и ги четете едно до друго — библиотеката полага книгите на масата; изборът е ваш.
- Query Expansion EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ сравняване
- Relevance Feedback EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ сравняване
- TREC Pooling and Relevance JudgmentsLibrary Information Science↔ сравняване
Цитиран в
Подобни методи
Забелязахте ли проблем на тази страница? Съобщете или предложете поправка →