Role Conflict and Ambiguity Scale
The Role Conflict and Ambiguity Scale measures two of the most studied sources of stress at work: receiving incompatible demands (role conflict) and not knowing clearly what is expected of you (role ambiguity). The theoretical foundation comes from Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, and Rosenthal's 1964 landmark study Organizational Stress, which framed the workplace as a system of role senders whose expectations shape the focal person's experience. Rizzo, House, and Lirtzman turned this theory into a practical instrument in their 1970 Administrative Science Quarterly paper, developing self-report scales for role conflict and role ambiguity that became the field's standard measure. The two constructs are kept distinct: conflict is about contradictory expectations, ambiguity about missing or unclear ones. The scales link role stress to tension, dissatisfaction, and impaired performance, and remain central to occupational-stress and role-theory research.
Изходен запис
Цитиранията са копирани дословно от изходния запис на метода. Те не предполагат проверка на ниво твърдение.
- Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150-163. · DOI 10.2307/2391486
- Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. John Wiley. · ISBN 9780471454700
Подбрани твърдения
Твърденията са запазени в регистъра на доказателствата, всяко със собствена оценка.
Този изглед не измисля оценка на твърдение, когато регистърът няма такава.
Свързани методи
Генерирани от графа на методите и показани като предложени от машината връзки — не се предполага твърдение за доказателство.